Thread:Robert Alvarez/@comment-867021-20141112175612

Hi Bob. We have a problem with Star Trek. It's nice to see you add in those issue templates, but on a licensed property that so many publishers have dealt with over the decades the volume numbering becomes a real mess. I read a little of your dispute with Fumnov over volumes. I tried to address this by specifying the publisher, ala Star Trek (DC) Vol 2 1, but I see that you have disregarded the changes that I made to Star Trek Vol 2 when you added the issue templates. I think specifying the publisher is the easiest way to deal with this situation. The problem that we have on this wiki going forward is accommodating series of a popular property like Star Trek that isn't already represented here. For example, the current volume setup for Star Trek does not take into account Marvel's 80s series as just one of the missing. I consider this your wiki, and I'm just helping out here, so I don't want to butt heads with you. I need to know how you plan to handle this, however, so that I can work accordingly. 