Thread:Robert Alvarez/@comment-8-20140923230618/@comment-8-20141007221937

Unfortunately you are right on the sex and nudity vs. violence dilemma. We go by US mores, which generally see the first as way more serious than the second. Look at the fuss made about various "costume malfunctions" that revealed the smallest amount of forbidden skin, compared to the amount of violence seen on TV in general.

But that's just my own exasperated rant. When it comes down to it, I need to work within those mores, illogical though they might be.

I've gone back over all my deletions, most of which have already been restored.File:Male vol26n3-1976.jpg] is one of the exceptions. That's clearly an erotic/sex magazine, and so doesn't get the pass that others do. That one will have to stay deleted.

I think it would work to have some sort of masking so that the title shows but none of the explicit content does. I'm happy to talk to you about this when you get to that section.

File:Comic_Art_Vol_1_30.jpg is over the line too. The implication of beastiality is a step too far. I left that one deleted

I've also gone though Ducksoup's deletions (yes, we did talk about magazines as art, so he's aware for the future). I restored those that were still deleted and checked the others. We should be back to the base-line now.

Let me know if you see anything else that needs a second look. Or ping Ducksoup, he can help if I'm not around He's willing to listen and work things out too :)

Thanks for waiting for me to get back